The Hunting of Hillary: The Forty-Year Campaign to Destroy Hillary Clinton - Michael D’Antonio Audiobook
Language: EnglishKeywords:
Biography
Hillary Clinton
Nonfiction
Politics
Shared by:ThaDreamkiller
Written by
Read by Gabra Zackman
Format: MP3
Bitrate: 64 Kbps
Unabridged
Length: 10 hours 51 minutes
Date of release: 2020
The Hunting of Hillary traces how an entire industry of hate, lies, and fear was created to persecute Hillary Clinton for decades and profit from it.
In The Hunting of Hillary, presidential biographer Michael D’Antonio details the years of lies and insults heaped upon Hillary Clinton as she pursued a life devoted to politics and policy. The worst took the form of sexism and misogyny, much of it barely disguised.
A pioneer for women, Clinton was burdened in ways no man ever was. Defined by a right-wing conspiracy, she couldn’t declare what was happening lest she be cast as weak and whiny. Nevertheless, she persisted and wouldn’t let them define her. As The Hunting of Hillary makes clear, her achievements have been all the more remarkable for the unique opposition she encountered. The 2016 presidential election can only be understood in the context of the primal and primitive response of those who just couldn’t imagine that a woman might lead.
For those who seek to understand the experience of the most accomplished woman in American politics, The Hunting of Hillary offers insight. For those who recognized what happened to her, it offers affirmation. And for those who hope to carry Clinton’s work into the future, it offers inspiration and instruction.
| Announce URL: | udp://tracker.torrent.eu.org:451/announce |
| This Torrent also has several backup trackers | |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.torrent.eu.org:451/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://zephir.monocul.us:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://p4p.arenabg.com:1337/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://open.stealth.si:80/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.leechers-paradise.org:6969 |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969 |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.open-internet.nl:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.tiny-vps.com:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://open.demonii.si:1337/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://thetracker.org:80/announce |
| Tracker: | http://tracker2.dler.org:80/announce |
| Creation Date: | Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:57:42 +0100 |
| This is a Multifile Torrent | |
| Michael D’Antonio - The Hunting of Hillary - 05.mp3 35.94 MBs | |
| Michael D’Antonio - The Hunting of Hillary - 01.mp3 15.37 MBs | |
| Michael D’Antonio - The Hunting of Hillary - 02.mp3 33.72 MBs | |
| Michael D’Antonio - The Hunting of Hillary - 03.mp3 27.2 MBs | |
| Michael D’Antonio - The Hunting of Hillary - 04.mp3 32.19 MBs | |
| Cover.jpg 23.18 KBs | |
| Michael D’Antonio - The Hunting of Hillary - 06.mp3 34.45 MBs | |
| Michael D’Antonio - The Hunting of Hillary - 07.mp3 21.21 MBs | |
| Michael D’Antonio - The Hunting of Hillary - 08.mp3 23.54 MBs | |
| Michael D’Antonio - The Hunting of Hillary - 09.mp3 30.25 MBs | |
| Michael D’Antonio - The Hunting of Hillary - 10.mp3 32.73 MBs | |
| Michael D’Antonio - The Hunting of Hillary - 11.mp3 11.71 MBs | |
| Combined File Size: | 298.35 MBs |
| Piece Size: | 256 KBs |
| Comment: | Updated by Biography Audiobooks |
| Info Hash: | 5e206412549ef582e875e074df376c354e645203 |
| Torrent Download: | Torrent Free Downloads |
| Tips: | Sometimes the torrent health info isn’t accurate, so you can download the file and check it out or try the following downloads. |
| Direct Download: | Start Direct Download |
| Tips: | You could try out alternative bittorrent clients. |
| Secured Download: | Download Files Now |
| AD: |
|
This post has 50 comments with rating of 5/5
August 31st, 2020
ah poor, dear, misunderstood hildabbest/// it’s all one vast right-wing conspiracy to beset you. You’re as pure as the driven snow, and as pure as a virgin and…
..my mama was right: drugs fry your brains. My bad.
August 31st, 2020
ah poor, dear, misunderstood hildabeest/// it’s all one vast right-wing conspiracy to beset you. You’re as pure as the driven snow, and as pure as a virgin and…
..my mama was right: drugs fry your brains. My bad.
August 31st, 2020
So nice, you said it twice.
Thanks for the dl, dream killer.
August 31st, 2020
Hahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa… Innocent…? Hahahaaaaaaaaaaa…
August 31st, 2020
They spent 40 years “investigating” her, never found a thing that would stand up in court. Doesn’t faze the “lock her up” MAGA and Qanaon twats and trolls. Just more lies and innuendo. Will probably have multi-page “comments” from their local militia regurgitating it again by tomorrow.
@spaniel1: thoughts and prayers for your fried brain.
August 31st, 2020
The only reason they never find anything is because they die the moment they announce they’re investigating her.
August 31st, 2020
I can’t believe Dems don’t see her as a dirty dog. Rs know Mitch McConnell is and can admit it. Why can’t Ds admit it? Do they really think she’s a good person?
Not sure, sort of a puzzle to me.
August 31st, 2020
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lawsuits_involving_Donald_Trump
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/06/fact-check-dan-vallance-hillary-was-in-court-and-lost-her-case.html
Um, you can’t handle the truth?
August 31st, 2020
@AndyBook “Why can’t Ds admit it?”
Why can’t R’s prove it?
They’ve had 30 years. They have control of the FBI, Justice Department. They would have “locked her up” if there was actually anything other than made up conspiracy BS.
August 31st, 2020
I have yet to see a credible rebuttable of her running a pay to play donation scam while secretary of state. Or any indication that anyone has investigated her for those accusations. Not a Trump fan but sincerely hope we’ve seen the last of the Clinton political dynasty.
August 31st, 2020
@Erouting, there is little justice in the world. We’ll just have to be satisfied knowing that the heinous bitch didn’t get to hear “Madame President”, and that she’ll always know what a loser she truly is.
August 31st, 2020
@erouting - https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/dec/09/viral-image/old-hoax-about-clinton-foundation-resurfaces-faceb/
-but of course that doesn’t change your opinion a bit.
August 31st, 2020
And with good reason! Protected by the msm. the Deep State, FBI, and DOJ, this woman, in some ways is more evil than her Rapist husband.
She’s like the elusive Nazi war criminal,living among us, but is yet to be caught. Hopefully, some day she will be brought to Justice.
These people should be on:10 Of History’s Most Twisted Couples Who Proved Evil Comes In Twos
The DumboRats “conspiracy, tin hat”, theories try to portray her as a victim. In truth, she created victims.
Fingers crossed!
August 31st, 2020
Lol.. too funny…
Didn’t she destroy herself (w/ Comey’s help)?
Trump said it best: Lock Her Up !!
August 31st, 2020
@illodiini, instead of giving a one time article, here’s the link to the Clinton Foundation’s annual reports.
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports
The reporting format seems to have changed since 2016 when I last looked at the reports. They no longer give the percentage of revenues that the expenditures were. So, anyone who’s looking won’t see that the Direct Expenditures from 2010 to 2014 used to run 9-11%. But that does match the 10% figure that Bill Clinton did say once during Hillary’s campaign trail and for which he was booted off the bus for a 2nd time (the first time was for saying Hillary’s had more women than he has had, which is hard to imagine).
Here’s a few simple questions for the adventurous people that may actually go look at the site, and then actually dig into the financials.
Q - Why is the largest donor of a US based charity their Canadian subsidiary? A - Because US law requires the charity to report who the donor were, where Canadian tax law doesn’t.
Q - How many people work for the Clinton Foundation? A - It never used to say anywhere on their site?
Q - Why only 3 countries in Africa? A - Because Frank Giustra (their partner in the Canadian subsidiary) is into mining, and those 3 countries gave very generous mining concessions.
I could easily go on, but what’s the point, you either realize that the charity is a fraud used to launder money for Hillary’s presidential run, or you don’t. It must hurt to watch the fund go from $300+ million a year to $20 million in 2018. But no, there was no pay to play going on there.
August 31st, 2020
The unhinged answers by the loon on here are hilarious.
“The only reason they never find anything is because they die the moment they announce they’re investigating her.” Evidence free lying.
“I have yet to see a credible rebuttable of her running a pay to play donation scam while secretary of state” Take your blindfold off.
https://www.vox.com/2017/11/17/16658080/uranium-one-clinton-russia-chart
“Protected by the msm. the Deep State, FBI, and DOJ,” lol Yep. Unhinged.
August 31st, 2020
@Andyinmanch, so you have no problem that as Secretary of State, Hillary gave $56 million dollars to a Lauderette Education LLC (a for profit company) which in turn Bill was given an honorary chancellor role and paid almost $18 million dollars?
Now in 2016, both the New York Times and Washington Post ran articles saying how generous it was for Hillary given those funds from the state department’s budget, and what a great guy Bill was for donating his time and energy.
Yep, please remind me again, what’s the SOS role? Shouldn’t contributions to education come from the Secretary of Education not the State Department? Why are taxpayer dollars going to a for profit company? And, I don’t know where you’re from, but having your husband receive almost $18 million is a pretty good kick back, that kind of tends to be illegal.
August 31st, 2020
The whining SJW’s bottom lips sticking out again - she was found out by most Americans who mhad a choice - Trump who’s hardly a good choice or Hilary Clinton who was far worse. Poor choice.
But the rioting and attacking people who didn’t obey the vile antifarts proved the American people right.
August 31st, 2020
AndyinMunchland is a fine example of the self-obsessed ranting SJW to whom facts and reality are “ist” and “phobic”
Fingers in ears eyes squeezed shut whining “La La Laa if i can’t hear it isn’t true” LOL
September 1st, 2020
“Protected by the msm. the Deep State, FBI, and DOJ”
Comey destroyed Clinton’s campaign by announcing just before the election he was, yet again, investigating “her emails”. Nothing came of it, of course, because there was never anything there. Yet you still insist the FBI /Deep State is protecting her?
Paranoid, credulous, conspiracy mongering, illogical loonies.
September 1st, 2020
It’s so crazy that when you’re a complete sh*tbag, the law keeps coming after you.
September 1st, 2020
“rivatej428
September 1st, 2020
It’s so crazy that when you’re a complete sh*tbag, the law keeps coming after you.”
The crazy is insisting they must be guilty when the law (not the Senate, or conspiracy theory nut jobs) never proves they are, especially when THE LAW has never come after them.
In case you forgot or never knew, the definition of crazy is to keep doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result.
September 1st, 2020
“Persecuted,” Really!? This should be tagged as “Humor.”
September 1st, 2020
Ten Bengahzi inquiries that led nowhere? “Lock Her Up” chants?
Only a snowflake could think that was persecution.
September 1st, 2020
@Gweilo, I realize as an Aussie, that you probably didn’t take an American Civics class, so you might not understand the US legal system and it’s relationship to Congress.
Congressional hearings for all their pomp and circumstance, ARE NOT legal proceedings. A congressional committee has NO legal authority. They have no right to detain nor imprison anyone.
So Hillary having to sweat through her pant suits repeatedly saying “I don’t know” or “I can’t recall”… isn’t actually being prosecuted.
And while the 7-10 different Bengahzi hearings were nothing more than a farce used by the Republicans to demonstrate Hillary’s personality to the nation, they did yield one thing that could easily have landed Hillary in prison, had the Republicans pursued it once Trump took office. That one thing was her email scandal.
Her perjury, obstruction of justice, evidence tampering, and treason are indefensible. Showing CSPAN footage of Hillary denying the servers existence, or the multiple “retractions” she made as to whether or not they contained government let alone classified documents would be very entertaining.
And, then there is the wiped drives themselves. Sure in the normal course of business, servers often get wiped, but these weren’t. The wiping was done while the drives were under a federal subpoena. And if the media was right, the 3rd party firm that did the bleach bit on the drives requested authorization from Hillary herself prior to bleaching them.
Treason is providing access to classified documents
who have not been cleared to see that information. Neither her attorneys nor the 3rd party firm they used to bleach bit the drives were cleared to see classified documents.
All of those are felonies and had Hillary been elected, she would have been impeached and probably expelled from office. As it was, she just lost the election due in part to that, her vile reputation, her own arrogance and condemnation of several states, and her toxic personality.
Unfortunately, for whatever reason (probably blackmail), Trump and the Republicans didn’t pursue this. A shame, because once again Americans see the elite are not held to the same standards as the citizens.
But anytime you (or the other Hillary fans) want to justify why it was necessary for Hillary to violate federal law in placing government documents (classified or not) onto a personal server, and then deleting those documents while under federal subpoena go ahead. I’m sure Hillary’s casual excuse that the 33,000 emails she deleted were all about Chelsea’s wedding plans and yoga practices like she said they were. Yeah, like that would excite the nation.
No, I’m guessing those emails probably were a little more sensitive that than. It’s one thing to get your hand slapped for perjury and the other felonies mentioned above. I wonder what those emails really were about.
Hmm, I wonder what ever became of Huma Abedin and Weiner’s laptop. You know, the one that contained the 680,000 emails that Huma had on it and that Comey made his October 2016 announcement on. While I’m sure that’s probably gone conveniently missing from FBI custody by now, it certainly would be interesting to read those emails. They probably contained plenty of juicy secrets about the Clinton affairs.
September 1st, 2020
@TD: “Congressional hearings for all their pomp and circumstance, ARE NOT legal proceedings”. Of course they aren’t. Because there was never any real evidence, the GOP had infinite “hearings” to spread lies and innuendo to create soundbites for Fox. Any real evidence, she would have been charged in a real court. Like the couple of dozen former Trumpies now convicted. In 40 years, they never found anything on Hillary that a judge would not laugh at. And “her emails”? Really?
Comey investigated that for the best part of a year. Found nothing. There are plenty of Trumpies in the FBI that would have leaked it if he had tried to cover it up.
September 1st, 2020
@Gweilo, I’ve already said that the Congressional hearing were a farce. While Obama’s and her policies contributed to the deaths of the four Americans in Bengahzi, she would never be prosecuted for those. It just demonstrated her lack of concern for her fellow citizens and specifically those people that worked directly and indirectly for her.
And while you’re always so quick to dismiss the emails, Comey’s investigation was at best another farce or at worst a Obama approved cover up.
Let’s recap some of the things wrong with the Clinton email investigation:
1) The federal who heard the Judicial Watch hearing was appointed by Bill Clinton. He should have recused himself from the case.
2) Although he did subpoena the servers, they weren’t seized by federal authorities.
3) The judge allowed the servers to sit in the Clinton’s possession for 18 months after the subpoena was issued, even though the State Department’s Inspector General made numerous requests of the Clintons and the judge for the servers.
4) When the servers were delivered, the drives had been wiped, and the FBI then took them.
5) Within two months, from the paper copies of the government emails delivered, the State Dept’s Inspector General announced that the servers contained over 2000 confidential documents, 200 classified documents, and 22 top secret documents.
6) Comey placed an illegal gag order prohibiting the agents reviewing the emails from discussing the emails with non-cleared staff.
7) On Thursday, AG Lynch conveniently meets Bill Clinton on the Phoenix tarmac, and they have a nice little conversation about his golf trip to Phoenix (which no golf courses ever confirmed the ex-President attended) and their grand children.
8) On Friday, James Comey went live on national television and makes speech about how while Hillary did many things wrong, she never intended to break the law. Aside from being an admission of guilt that she did actually break the law, intent has nothing to do with whether or not a crime has been committed.
9) Oct 2016, Comey once more goes public and says it’s come to light that Abedin and Weiner’s laptop may contain the missing emails, and they need to validate it.
10) Comey says that he just found out about the emails the previous night, but when Lynch speaks the day after Comey’s announcement, she says the AG’s office has been discussing it for a week.
11) A week later, Comey comes back and says they didn’t find any emails other than those in the first investigation that took 8 months to review. Let’s just ignore the fact that the laptop contained 680,000 emails which Abedin may have compiled over the last 20 years as Hillary’s right hand woman.
Now all this is done under Obama’s nose, and of course, the he’s not going to tell the DNC that his former SOS and the candidate they’ve been setting up for the last 8 years is guilty as hell. No, we’ll just let that slide.
Matter of fact, while Jim Comey’s trying to figure out a way of covering his ass so the Republicans don’t throw the Hatch Act at him if he doesn’t make his October announcement, Hillary and Michelle Obama are out in California the week before Comey’s announcement telling people should vote early. Did AG Lynch tell them about the latest predicament? No, that’s couldn’t have happened.
But yeah, you go right ahead and keep telling yourself that those deleted emails weren’t important and that Hillary’s a saint. If they were so meaningless, why bother to deleting them in the first place, let alone bleach biting the drives? No, obviously they were far more incriminating than risking getting her hand slapped for perjury.
But the American people will never know. And that’s on her, Trump, and three federal judges from the US Court of Appeals that overturned another judge’s ruling that Hillary would have to testify in Court regarding her emails on Aug 14th.
While I suppose Judicial Watch could take their case to the Supreme Court, I don’t they will. Even if they did, it wouldn’t be heard for years, and by then, either Hillary would be dead (no small loss imo) or justices may or may not left leaning.
So, the American public is once again left with justice for the elite being different than justice for most of us.
September 1st, 2020
@TotallyDisenfranchised: 726 words about “her emails”
“Comey’s investigation was at best another farce or at worst a Obama approved cover up.”
Right, an Obama approved cover up that COST HER THE PRESIDENCY.
You — truthers think that Comey protected Hillary by putting her emails in the headlines for months, while not saying a word about the far more serious investigation of Trump until it was far too late?
Who covered it up after Comey was fired? When Sessions was AG?
Anyway, I refer to my very first comment: if any of this was real, it would have been said in a real court, and she would have been “locked up”. But there was never anything real.
September 1st, 2020
@TotallyDisenfranchised - Get a life. I really mean that. Endless floods of pseudo-facts and rumors don’t make it. While it’s true that rich and connected have a better chance to defend and protect themselves, in this age of social media, they’re not above law. And jealous and envious people are everywhere. Truth will out and (most of) the lies get exposed. That’s really it.
September 1st, 2020
@Gweil, the number of words doesn’t mean that her crimes are any less. And by the way, Comey didn’t keep her emails in the media for 8 months, she did when she illegally refused to turn her server over to the State Dept.
Trump should have fired Comey in his first week in office, and he should have had his new Director of the FBI investigate the email scandal. But by the time he fired Comey, he had already said he wasn’t going to pursue an investigation into Hillary.
Whatever, while I don’t like that justice once again hasn’t been served, it’s very heart warming to know how incredibly frustrating it must be Hillary to have to be reminded she lost her opportunity to hear Madam President twice. The 2nd time must really hurt to know she lost to Trump.
All those years of planning and positioning. All those hundreds of millions of dollars wasted. And now the retirement fund is drying up.
So sad, I almost feel as if I should shed a tear for her. Oh hell, who am I kidding, I’m laughing my ass off knowing what a loser she is.
September 1st, 2020
@illodiini, too bad everything I said in the previous posts about Hillary’s email scandal was true and reported in the main stream media.
Of course, they gave it light reporting, back paged, or even blatantly dismissed it much like you and Gweilo do.
That doesn’t change the fact that these things happened and that Hillary did was still illegal as hell. Anytime you would care to provide a rational explanation why some one who was First Lady, a State Senator who sat on the Armed Services committee, and Secretary of State, who signed annual security agreements for those roles, and was a former attorney would knowingly violate federal laws to utilize a personal email server to store confidential, classified, and top secret documents on please, do let us know. Also, why exactly did those harmless personal emails have to be deleted and the drive bleach bit? Feel free, to explain that.
September 1st, 2020
“main stream media. Of course, they gave it light reporting….”
FFS, media doesn’t matter. COURTS MATTER.
Nothing in all your walls of text is real. It’s all garbage from the right wing conspiracy alternate universe. Nothing that you could TAKE BEFORE A JUDGE.
Anyway, if you’re lucky, Trump provokes a civil war and retains office, then he will appoint even more conservative judges and probably tell Barr to get Hillary. I’m sure you will enjoy it, if you survive.
September 1st, 2020
@Gweilo, it’s amusing on how you can be so convinced that Trump is guilty of everything that the msm throws out there, but can’t even begin to handle the concept that Hillary has committed crimes.
Too bad you can’t handle the truth!
September 2nd, 2020
@Gweilo i would love love love to see ur face when the truth comes out…PRICELESS:)
September 2nd, 2020
“Trump is guilty of everything that the msm throws out there”
Screw the “MSM” BS. I believe the “MSM” when they can back it up with facts.
Read the Muller Report. read the Senate Intelligence Report https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf
Not to mention all the more prosaic crimes Trump has ALREADY been convicted of. Trump University, fined $25 million. His fraudulent foundation. etc, etc. All ten times worse than anything you fantasize about Hillary, the difference being he was taken to court and the case was PROVED IN COURT.
“when the truth comes out”– Right. So you are Qanon now. A Vast Conspiracy that only those intelligent enough to read the hidden signs understand. Black helicopters, assassins, pizza.
I’m climbing out of this rabbit hole now. Its not funny, it’s tragic. Trump is destroying your country and you are cheering him on.
September 2nd, 2020
Gweilo, you’re sounding a bit rattled. Running out of source material?
As I have already explained to The Mueller Report is a joke. Your “proof” of Trump’s being elected due to the Russian Trolls and supposed collusion with them is pathetically laughable. A fifth grader could argue that out in court. Not even Mueller himself during his congressional hear could say Trump colluded with the Russians, so his supposed obstruction of justice offense was meaningless.
Two years, probably about $50 million dollars, and for what, a 500+ page document that’s uses misleading statements to try and make a simple point that doesn’t not provide conclusive proof of anything other than there were Russian trolls.
“In total the IRA-controlled [Facebook] accounts made over 80,000 posts before their deactivation in August 2017, and these posts reached at least 29 million U.S persons and ‘may have reached an estimated 126 million people’”
Here’s where your Russian troll theory breaks down:
1) While 80,000 as a number may seem impressive, when put into context as social media posts, it’s actually quite small.
2) The Mueller report didn’t break that 80,000 posting number down into how many were made before November 8, 2016 or how many were made after. That’s an important distinction, because the postings made after November 8th, couldn’t influence the vote. Yet Facebook posts are dated, so if they can count them belonging to an account (or group of accounts), they should be able to report exactly how many were made when.
3) And then there’s the last part, “these posts reached at least 29 million U.S persons and ‘may have reached an estimated 126 million people’”. Ok, I’ll admit I have no idea on how they would measure how many people would have seen a post (Likes/Thumbs up perhaps), but the the words “at least 29 million” and “an estimated 126 million” causes 2 problems: “at least” demonstrates an indeterminable amount of precision in quantifying the number, and “an estimated 126 million” can just as accurately be stated as “a wild ass guess of 126 million”.
So, your Russian Troll theory relies on:
A significant number of American people being so stupid as to form political opinions
1) based on a relatively small number of social media posts
2) that intentionally obfuscates both the timeframe and number of when the postings may have been made,
3) and which can’t even quantify how many people actually saw those postings, let alone begin to say how many may have cast their votes based on that.
That’s your proof, misleading and poorly documented statistics with no confirmation.
September 2nd, 2020
The Trump University lawsuit was SETTLED, no court room fine was made. While I think Trump should have taken his chances in court, but I guess when you can afford to pay $25 million to take a nuisance suit off your hands and get rid of a bunch of ass hats that were too stupid to research that they were paying out their “life savings” to a non-credential, non-degreed, little better than a late night real estate scheme program, then they kind of deserve what they get.
And the Trump charity is another joke. Size wise, that charity wasn’t even the size of stamp on a letter compared to the Clinton Foundation that raked in close to $2 BILLION dollars between 2010 thru 2016. The direct expenditures to charitable activities was only about 10%.
Yeah, that almost compares to perjury, actual obstruction of justice, evidence tampering and treason. Let alone the graft and kick backs as Secretary of State.
But you keep telling yourself that Hillary is a saint. Yep, this from the woman who ranted after the 2016 Presidential debates on how un-American and non-Democratic it would be if Trump didn’t concede should he lose the election. Nice little commercial there in the 2020 DNC convention where now she’s saying “Never concede.” That’s right, the constitution and actual democracy do not matter, if you don’t get your way, keep fighting.
September 2nd, 2020
Well here’s a newsflash for you Gweilo, the United States of America probably won’t be having a civil war again. Yes racism exists in the US, it will also always exist to some degree. Whether Trump or Biden is elected, it will still exist as it’s part of the human condition.
But is Trump destroying the country or is it the Left:
Who is encouraging, if not supporting, the rioting that is taking place in Democrat controlled cities in our nation? Like the 90+ days of riots in Portland. Which political party benefits the most from those riots that are continuing to happen?
Why do the riots continue to happen in those Democrats controlled cities, and why aren’t they happening in the Republican controlled cities to the same extent?
Does racism not exist in the police departments in Republican controlled cities to the same extent as those controlled by Dems?
Why has the violent crime rates soared in NY, Chicago, Atlanta, Portland, and even Minneapolis, all cities that have talked about defunding the police or in the case of Minneapolis disbanding the police?
Why does the media not provide equal coverage for both sides of the violence and which party benefits from that?
Examples include: the coverage of this week’s shooting in Portland where the media is portraying that after 90+ days of violent (yes, I consider arson, destruction of property, and looting violence) protests a pro-Trump rally is held and the media blames the rally for a pro-Trump supporter being shot.
Kenosha Wi, after a week of again violent protests, a stupid 17 year old kid is running around on the streets with an AR-15. You see lots of video coverage of people chasing him down the street, him lying on the ground and him firing his gun. But what you don’t see is the context of did he believe the people chasing him were intent upon hurting him, and was he defending himself. Yet the media has painted him as a murderer. Not to mention tying it all back to Trump, as if he requested that kid to be out on the streets.
How about the media’s failing to report the 22 injured in the largest shooting in 2020? On the streets of Washington DC last month, 22 people were injured when a black shooter opened fire on black people. What story was more important, the possibility of a virus outbreak at the Sturgis rally. Yep, nothing news worthy in another shooting incident.
Or, how about the month before where 15 people were injured in Chicago in a drive by shooting as they were coming out of a funeral home. Yep, that barely made the news, once again black people shooting black people.
If Black Lives Matter, does that not imply blacks are injuring/killing blacks too? Or is that just not worthy of news coverage. That’s racism, for worse than anything Trump has said or done.
You blame Trump for destroying our country, I blame the media and the Democrats that are encouraging the violence. When the media refuse to report both sides of an issue, when they’re not willing to take a non-biased stance, it’s not longer reporting, it’s MARKETING. And whether you understand this or not, MARKETING COMPANIES LIE, that’s their job, to sell a product!
And if their selling a product, who are they selling it for? Oh, that’s right. Gee, how convenient for the Democrats to continue to be divisive.
The tragic outcome of this may be more deaths, but at whose hands should the guilt really be laid.
September 2nd, 2020
As for you getting out of the rabbit hole, please do so! You’re obviously not capable of questioning what you read/see/hear and considering both sides of the issues.
For you, it’s only Trump is bad, the Left is right. The Left is justified in all it’s actions, no matter what the consequences are because the ends justify the means.
September 2nd, 2020
Why are you wasting your time here? No one is reading the thousands of words you are writing here. I used to get pocket money writing op-eds for a newspaper, 850 words. The right has money to burn, you should be able to get a gig in their media. There are Qanons standing for office now too. Putin is hiring too. Just make sure you cleanse your Tw1tter history before applying. Good luck.
September 2nd, 2020
@TotallyDisenfranchised - SAD!
September 2nd, 2020
Because I believe in free speech, and neither the far left or the far right should be able to control the media.
If no one reads my posts, why do you care so much?
Thanks for the job tips, I just don’t think I’m far right enough for them, and I certainly couldn’t do the left wing crap like so many without puking. Have a nice day!
September 2nd, 2020
Alright, I’ve just got to ask.
So did that op-ed gig run from the spring of 2015 thru Jan 2017? Were you actually part of the Hillary’s paid army of trolls working for Correct the Record, or were you just picking up bits and having your work subsidized by George Soros?
If that’s the case, man you seriously drank too much kool-aid!
September 2nd, 2020
You seem sincere, if deluded,and so would fit right in on one of those conspiracy nut sites. Instead of spending all day writing stuff here that is just laughed at if it’s read at all, you might have an audience.
September 2nd, 2020
All you have to do Gweilo is answer one simple question.
If Hillary’s email servers was so innocent, why was it necessary for her to bleach bit the drives after she printed out the 31,000 federal documents?
The drives were under federal subpoena, she was required by that and by her position as SOS to turn over any and all hardware that may have contained federal correspondence. Including the 13 blackberries she claims she lost in the 4 years (Damn things must be disposable!). Yet she choose to permanently delete the drives rather than allowing the US Inspector General access to them.
Answer that question with a rational answer as to why a former lawyer, First Lady, Senator who sat on the Armed Services Committee, and Secretary of State, who signed annual security agreements, would knowingly violate federal law and a federal subpoena, isn’t illegal as hell.
Until then, I say you’re the deluded one. It’s a simple question.
September 3rd, 2020
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/sean-hannity-cant-stop-repeating-one-trumps-biggest-hillary-clinton-lies-1121885
This won’t satisfy you, of course.
Forty years of investigation by her enemies, highly motivated to proves something,anything, against her and all you got is a technical violation of data security laws that absolutely no other politician follows to the letter. That the FBI investigated exhaustively, repeatedly and could do nothing other than wag a finger; or they would have to indict everyone else in congress and the White House.
Whatever crime is being concealed by deleting these emails somehow left absolutely no trace in the world. She truly is a master criminal. And the sad thing is that I am being ironic; you really think it’s a gotcha — My God YOU ARE QANON! You can’t prove you aren’t, therefore you must be!!!!
September 3rd, 2020
Well, Hillary might have scolded Bill for dipping his dick again in a trainee. Or some such. There is such a thing as “not essential to the security of State”.
But, because you’re an imbecile, this is not something you’d consider, my good TotallyD.
September 5th, 2020
@Gweilo, Your article ( https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/sean-hannity-cant-stop-repeating-one-trumps-biggest-hillary-clinton-lies-1121885 ) dated 6/25/2018 is wonderful example of shoddy reporting. Whether or not it’s initial or on purpose is certainly suspect, but I’m assuming your answer to my question lies in the quote from the article below:
“The FBI, in a report released in September 2016, two days before Trump’s first reference to acid-washing, explained what happened: an unnamed employee of the company that maintained Clinton’s private server, Platte River Networks, forgot to comply with a December 2014 request from a Clinton aide to delete emails older than 60 days. In late March 2015, the employee realized the mistake and “sometime between March 25-31, 2015, deleted the Clinton archive mailbox from the PRN server and used BleachBit to delete the exported .PST files he had created on the server system containing Clinton’s e-mails.”
Basically, your answer is an “Oops, I just realized I forgot and deleted the emails under federal subpoena sometime in the last week.” Damn convenient for Hillary wouldn’t you say? It sounds almost like something Bill might have said “Well, I was just walking across the Oval Office when I stumbled and somehow my dick ended up in Miss Lewinski’s mouth.”
Had the reporter bothered to check, he could have easily found out the name of the Platte River Networks’ employee was Paul Combetta. Paul was one of the 5 people given immunity deals by the FBI prior to interviewing them, along with Hillary’s staff Cheryl Mills, Bryan Pagliano, John Bentel, and Heather Samuelson. There is an excellent article https://www.shiftfrequency.com/immunity-deals-fixed-clinton-outcome/ dated 2/29/2016, that discusses the perils of the immunity deals, especially when all the individuals have the same attorney. Certainly makes it easier to keep the story straight that way. And while this is just me, this quote from the article resonates so much: “The easiest way for prosecutors to scuttle a criminal case is to immunize those people who are at the greatest risk of criminal indictment.”
Anyway, back to your “answer”. So you have to wonder why Paul Combetta, after realizing this mistake, didn’t restore it from the backups. And you may say, what if he didn’t have any backups. Well, fortunately for Paul, he did. It appears he copied them to the gmail account: [email protected]. There’s quite a few good articles you can find online if you search for “CarterHeavylndustries gmail”. One of the interesting ones was https://www.ellatinoamerican.com/noticias/judicial-watch-subpoenas-google-in-hillary-clinton-email-lawsuit dated 4/16/2020. It seems the judge was a bit miffed that not only did the FBI know about the backup of the emails, but they didn’t share them with the State Department. Finding out that a contractor copied the files to Google’s servers was interesting. It also makes me wonder how many other copies of confidential and classified documents Paul copied, and who else might have accessed them.
Sorry, I guess you’re right, I won’t accept your answer. There’s just too many layers in the onion of lies. Just think how simple it would have been for Hillary it would have been if she had just followed the law and provided the State Dept with the emails as she was required to do when she left office. And failing that, when she was first asked at the Benghazi hearings if she used a personal email server for government business if she had simply told the truth instead of the multiple denials to the server’s existence, and then whether it contained government documents, and then whether it contained classified or above documents! And while I may loathe Hillary Clinton, she is a very intelligent individual, so I find it impossible to believe the someone who has been in roles where they read confidential and/or classified documents for 20 years, didn’t know that (c) in front of the paragraph didn’t know that it stood for classified and not an enumeration. How many blatant lies does she have to say before you start to see for what she really is?
September 5th, 2020
“Basically, your answer is an “Oops, I just realized I forgot and deleted the emails under federal subpoena sometime in the last week.” ”
No, my answer is what they FBI actually reported happened.
You have proven one thing though, with these thousands of words of conspiracy mongering: you are clinically insane.
September 5th, 2020
Whatever!
Add a comment